Friday, March 27, 2009

Wow...Didn't see that one coming...(KC rolls eyes)

The playbook of the Left Wing in this country and the world is basically a 3 step process:

1. Perpetuate a crisis (real or imagined)

2. Claim Authority as the only people qualified to save us all from said crisis

3. Transfer wealth from the productive members of society to the government or world body to enable the ruling class to grab more power and take away our freedoms.

Apparently, the UN has been taking these steps with the imagined "Global Warming" crisis.

Foxnews reports that "A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes - all under the supervision of the world body."

If that doesn't put a chill down your spine, I have given up on you.

Now, I have long stated the the UN is probably the most evil organization in the world. At least we get to see the ultimate plan of taking over the world under one governing body and making slaves of us all under the pretense of saving the planet.

Not surprisingly, "The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.".

If only....

The Onion: Detroit Sold for Scrap

This should be added as an option to my plan for Detroit.

Awesome! Terrorists to be Integrated into American Society!

Not satisfied with just reducing the American taxpayer to indentured servant status to the government overlords, The Chosen One now tries his hand at population control.

I think from this article, this quote is my favorite:

"If we are to release them in the United States, we need some sort of assistance for them to start a new life," said National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair at his first press conference.

ARE YOU F**KING KIDDING ME????? Free terrorist murderers into society with enough welfare to get them by?

I have a better plan, why not line them up and shoot them all down? I believe those are the rights they are afforded by the Geneva Convention. Enough of this.

This administration has made the fateful step from stupidity to insanity.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Rahm "Never Waste a Crisis" Emmanuel help create the economic crisis?


I'll take the conspiracy theory another step further from where Hotair took it today.

The Chicago Tribune reports on how well Freddie Mac board member Rahm Emmanuel made out while plunging America into today's economic crisis.

During his tenure as a board member:

Freddie Mac hatched an illegal accounting scam that fudged numbers in order to pay its high ranking employees million dollar bonuses. Think Enron, only on a much higher level and ignored by the left-wing mainstream media.

"Many of those same risky investment practices tied to the accounting scandal eventually brought the firm to the brink of insolvency and led to its seizure last year by the Bush administration, which pledged to inject up to $100 billion in new capital to keep the firm afloat. The Obama administration has doubled that commitment."

"(T)he company hatched a plan to enhance its political muscle. That scheme, also reviewed by the board, led to a record $3.8 million fine from the Federal Election Commission for illegally using corporate resources to host fundraisers for politicians. Emanuel was the beneficiary of one of those parties after he left the board and ran in 2002 for a seat in Congress from the North Side of Chicago." Basically, he was a board member approving illegal campaign contributions to himself.

Must be nice being a liberal insider. You get a sweet paying job when you're in between positions of power on the American Taxpayer, then destroy the company to make millions in bonuses for you and your friends, the government bails out the company and you become White House Chief of Staff. Sweet.

Now, here's the kicker, he gets to use the financial crisis that he helped create to jam through The Chosen One's socialist agenda! Never waste a crisis!

Left Wing Profiteer doing quite well while millions suffer

Real Life Dr. Evil

I am not sure whether he helped create the crisis that he's profiting so well from, or just enjoying "the culminating point of (his) life’s work" making a billion dollars while normal working families struggle to make ends meet. Either way, George Soros is one of the most vile, despicable human beings on the face of the earth.

I say this because he poured millions and millions of dollars into socialist, left-wing groups whose mission was to elect individuals that are largely responsible for the world wide crisis he's basking in. Is he responsible for getting people like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi and, yes, The Chosen One in power? I cannot say for sure. After all, his agenda was on a terrible losing streak during the Bush years. Regardless, his puppets are the ones who wrecked the economy and are making things worse. But, at least he's enjoying himself!

Maybe the Burning-Torch-Pitchfork-Carrying Mob threatening AIG executives and their children will take a breath and learn what's really going on, then we can send them to this scumbag's house.

PS. After reading the HotAir post again, I realized my rant is very similar to Allahpundit's. So, I am citing them for my inspiration for the conspiracy theory.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Obamaprompta - Phonetic Switch on OFF

Obviously someone forgot to switch on the Phonetic Spelling feature on the Obamapromta.

Orion = OAR-ree-yun?

Friday, March 20, 2009

Call Captain Buzzkill, We need an Intervention

This would be the worst day of my life!

There is not a more depressing show on TV than A&E's Intervention. Each week, they bring you a trainwreck story of a junkie/alcoholic/problem gambler/cutter. Usually, the subject was an honor student/terrific athlete/talented musician growing up and somewhere along the way, well, lost his or her way.

One common thing that I've observed is that there is always an enabler among the troubled one's loved ones. The enabler gives him or her money or let's the partyer do drugs in the house or protects junkie from any consequences that might upset the poor soul. The enabler in his or her heart really wants the problem child to get better, but cannot bring him or herself to say "no more".

Finally, they get up the courage to try and put an end to the destructive behavior and save the lost soul. At this point, there's the big surprise where everyone is there to plead with the subject to go to rehab along with Interventionist who facilitates the meeting. A&E has 3 different interventionists that work on this show, I call them Captain Buzzkill, Lady Killjoy and Prince Party Pooper.

For some reason I cannot get this analogy out of my head after witnessing the entire AIG bonus fiasco.

AIG (and other bailout companies) was the golden child. Somewhere along the way, maybe it was the pressure of living up to parental expectations (Democrats Agenda to lend money to people who cannot afford to pay it back), cracks under pressure and is now the lost soul mired in misery, broke and in need of help. Now the governmental enablers step in and hope that throwing money at the problem (hey, at least they are under my roof and supervision, therefore they cannot hurt themselves too much) will alleviate the problem. The end result down the road, the enabler is saddened and sometimes, even surprised that the problem child used some of that money to get high (or pay themselves bonuses)!

Well, we all know now that the liberal grandstanding was all a show to distract from the fact that they were the ones who OK'd the bonuses in the first place. Also, we all know they do not care for the companies like a loved one. They were caught and had to throw the evil corporation under the bus. But still, can you see the parallel I am drawing here? It's pretty damn depressing!

At this point, what do we do now? Is it time to call in Captain Buzzkill to DC?

KC's College Basketball Pick - Duke! Coach K Rules!

Ladies and Gentlemen, The Teleprompter of the United States

Searching for answers
I found the blog by Obama's Teleprompter on the Drudge Report yesterday. All I can say is that it is hilarious! I definitely recommend a look. The Obamaprompta brings you an inside look of his daily activities and just how important he is to the decisions made from the executive office.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Transition Turmoil - Part 2

I dare anyone, ANYONE to refute what I am stating:

This is the worst administration at this point (52 days) in the history of the United States.

No one with a brain would argue this point. Anyone who is an Obama supporter will choose to go on about George Bush rather than defend their guy now. I know how it is, it took me 6 years to finally stop defending George Bush, but 52 days??? It may be early, but the missteps this group of egomaniacal neophytes is unsurpassed in history.

Today, Day 52, his tech office gets raided for a bribery investigation and yet another Treasury nominee withdraws. Does this guy know anyone who is not crooked or a tax cheat? What else at Day 52....hmm....the market is down 25%, China senses weakness and illegally confronts an unarmed US surveillance ship, our new buddies in Iran demand an apology from the US before any talks can begin, 8,500 earmarks in the latest bill signed by Mr. Earmark-Reform-Campaign-Promise-Guy and a half-staffed Treasury Department that the press claims he's focused like a laser on.

Below is from the NY Post. A quick scorecard on how poor his vetting process is:

There's plenty of time to get this turned around. For the sake of the nation, we better hope he does. Let's just call it as it is, folks. The worst start in history.

Maybe they'll stop their 30 year war on us if we just talk to them!

Amir Taheri, in my opinion, is the most prominent expert on Iran in journalism. Every time I read something from him, I learn something new on Middle East politics, social norms and culture. In Sunday's New York Post, he reviews Khomeini's Ghost: The Iranian Revolution and the Rise of Militant Islam by Con Coughlin.

Taheri, and anyone who's ever read his articles, knows all to well that the new administration is no match for what the mullah's have been planning for the past 30 years. He even goes on to say that they "would benefit from Coughlin's account of Khomeinist involvement in the insurgencies in both Iraq and Afghanistan." In particular, as Coughlin writes, "Tehran took the view that its own strategy of fueling the insurgency [in Iraq] by all means at its disposal was working. The longer the United States and its allies were bogged down in Iraq, the less likely they were to act over Iran's nuclear program." He adds: "By the spring of 2007 senior NATO commanders found compelling evidence that the Revolutionary Guard had set aside their traditional antipathy towards the Taliban and were supplying them with roadside bombs and rockets to attack NATO positions, particularly British forces deployed in southern Afghanistan."

Coughlin's main argument throughout is that these people have absolutely no intention and sitting down and playing nice with us. They do not regard The New Messiah as their messiah. They've been at war with us for 30 years because "Iran has maintained its uncompromising devotion to its unique expression of revolutionary Islam, no matter how much hostility from the outside world. And so long as the heirs to Khomeini's revolution maintained their iron grip on power, the Islamic republic of Iran would continue to uphold the banner of radical Islam and proclaim its defiance of the rest of the world."

As Coughlin shows, and Taheri agrees, "the real question is not whether or not to go to war against Iran but how to end the war that Iran has been waging against the US for three decades."

Now I am loathe to call someone older than me naive, especially the POTUS. But, can anyone else come up with a better adjective on this negotiate-until-all-else-fails-then-negotiate-more policy Dear Leader and his Secretary of State insist on pursuing?

If I can get this point from a book review, why can't the foreign policy experts in the new administration get it?